Andrew Stunell

Working hard for Bredbury, Compstall, Great Moor, Hawk Green, Hazel Grove, Heaviley, High Lane, Marple, Marple Bridge, Mellor, Offerton, Romiley, Rose Hill, Strines & Woodley since 1997

Andrew Stunell

GOVERNMENT DECISION LEAVES STOCKPORT'S POOREST FAMILIES £780 A YEAR OUT OF POCKET

11.23.00am GMT Mon 9th Nov 2009

Andrew Stunell

The Government is set to cut nearly £800 from the budgets of some of Stockport's poorest people in April, according to Hazel Grove MP Andrew Stunell.

Government plans to alter the Local Housing Allowance could leave low-income families up to £780 a year worse off. At the moment, families receiving Local Housing Allowance (LHA) are able to keep up to £15 a week if they choose a home with a rent below the Local Housing Allowance's maximum for their area. Chancellor Alistair Darling now proposes removing the £15 a week payment from April next year.

Estimates indicate that around half of all the people receiving LHA pay a contractual rent that is lower than the LHA maximum rate. This means that over 1,500 people in the borough will lose out as a result.

Commenting, Andrew Stunell said:

"£15 per week may seem like small change to Government Ministers, but for local families struggling to make ends meet this money is important.

"The government has a track record in secretly raising taxes for the poorest and most vulnerable people. Now they want to take away a vital source of their income just like that.

"Cutting this scheme will save very little money, if any at all, but will make a huge difference to local families budgets. This is irresponsible behaviour from Labour during a recession, and Gordon Brown has once again abandoned the people who need the most help."

Now Mr Stunell is joining with other Liberal Democrat MPs to press the Government for a rethink.

ENDS

Printed and hosted by Prater Raines Ltd, 98 Sandgate High Street, Folkestone CT20 3BY.
Published and promoted by Andrew Stunell, Liberal Democrat Office, 34 Stockport Road, Romiley, Stockport SK6 3AA.
The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider.